a brilliant, commanding critique of the current insanity--I want to talk to the author and publish his work--we have to come together against this war--there are more of us than we (probably) realize!
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
Jewish Corruption in Ukraine . . . by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
❝. . . the present conflict is a huge distraction from the fact that, for decades, the biggest threat to Ukraine hasn’t been Russia, but financiers and speculators operating with impunity within Ukraine’s borders to exploit ethnic Ukrainians and plunder their resources.❞
Jeffrey Sachs: US biotech cartel behind Covid origins and cover-up
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
He has also served as the chair of the COVID-19 (year-long) commission on the virus origin for leading medical journal the Lancet.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
When looking at the fire and clouds of the bombed ammunition depo, one should also consider the claim by Russian security chief Patrushev included depleted uranium shells admittedly provided by the UK https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/russia-claims-radioactive-cloud-moving-toward-western-europe/2901561. Hopefully the claim is wrong, but that doesn't end the threat of radiation from this delivery from Britain.
Funding Both Sides: How Jewish Money Controls British Politics . . .
“During the previous Labour government, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were ardent Zionists because they accepted the justice of Israel’s cause, not because Labour’s chief fund-raisers were first the Jew Michael Levy and then the Jew Jonathan Mendelsohn (both are now members of the House of Lords). And during the current Conservative government, David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson have been ardent Zionists because they too accept the justice of Israel’s cause, not because the Conservatives’ chief fund-raisers have been first the Jew Sir Mick Davis and then the Jew Sir Ehud Sheleg.”
Not sure what 'peace movement' you're referring to. Not the one I'm with. True, there are some of the usual peace suspects (especially veterans) who can't get loose of their allegiance to combat as an acceptable tool of national affairs, but in fact the peace movement has been doing all it can to urge cease-fire and negotiations.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
Wow. The amount of fact that is MISSING from that advert (And from your column) is simply amazing. Just as a f'rinstance or two:
1994: [blank]
In reality, Russia signed the Budapest Memorandum, guaranteeing Ukraine's then-borders (cough cough Crimea Donbass Lukhansk cough) in return for Ukraine's turning over two THOUSAND functioning nuclear warheads for dismantlement and disposal. The US did too, you might note. Our shipping them arms and providing other help (all that blather above about the US making this war worse aside) is ENTIRELY in line with our agreement under that Memorandum to respect their sovereignty in their then-current borders, especially in light of Ukraine becoming a "victim of aggression".
2009: US Announces plan to put missile systems into Poland and Romania.
You mean the defensive-only Aegis Ashore installations? That have _standard_ length Mk41 VLS tubes, that are not _strike length_ and thus _incapable of accepting Tomahawk cruise missiles_, but can only accept SM-2/3/-6 SAM/ABM missiles? THOSE missile systems? As opposed to, say, SS-26 Iskander and SS-21 Tochka SRBM systems?
I could continue at length, but I don't think I need to - the point is made.
Never mind the craven, Chamberlain-eseque crie de prostration.
Sorry, but closer scrutiny confirms the timeline of the ad:
Jack Matlock, US amb to USSR from 1987-1991, a signatory of the ad, wrote the following about the Budapest Memorandum in light of the violation of pledge that NATO would not move toward Russia:
With regard to the Budapest Memorandum, former US ambassador to the USSR Jack Matlock (a signer of the ad) has written:
"One persistent U.S. demand is that Ukraine’s territorial integrity be restored. Indeed, the U.S. is party to the Budapest Memorandum in which Russia guaranteed Ukraine’s territorial integrity in return for Ukraine’s transfer of Soviet nuclear weapons to Russia for destruction in accord with U.S.-Soviet arms control agreements. What the U.S. demand ignores is that, under traditional international law, agreements remain valid rebus sic stantibus (things remaining the same). When the Budapest memorandum was signed in 1994 there was no plan to expand NATO to the east and Gorbachev had been assured in 1990 that the alliance would not expand. When in fact it did expand right up to Russia’s borders, Russia was confronted with a radically different strategic situation than existed when the Budapest agreement was signed."
"Do the Russians have a point? Technically, yes, but it’s complicated. Few missile defense experts buy Moscow’s argument that the Aegis Ashore system is a covert cover-up for putting cruise missiles closer to Russia’s borders. But the MK 41 launchers inside the missile defense batteries could be adapted to fire Tomahawks, experts said, if all the supporting hardware and software is also upgraded for that purpose. Those updates—or trucking in new weapons—would be difficult to do without tipping Russian intelligence agencies."
Sorry, but Moscow's legal remedy to a change in circumstances is to abrogate the agreement legally, and/or renegotiate. There's plenty of examples of that very thing being done. They did neither, so Mr Matlock's biased and fallacious interpretation fails a basic legal test.
As for Aegis Ashore, no, the existing Mk41 launchers could not be adapted to fire Tomahawk. That's why Strike length Mk41 was developed. Because the Tomahawk missiles package is physically incapable of fitting in a standard Mk41 silo.
Jeezus, all this stuff is publicly available, and widely documented.
The ad's timeline accurately states that Russia tried to negotiate a remedy to the changed circumstances in December 2021 but was rebuffed by the US and NATO. And it's also useful to point out that the Euroepan Aegis missiles exist because the US unilaterally broke the ABM treaty, without any effort to do so "legally, and/or renegotiate". Matlock's interpretation of international law is non-biased and accurate.
MK-41s can be adapted to fire Tomahawk missiles. I gave you one publicly available documented source for that in my previous post. Here's another:
"Some independent experts, however, believe that while requiring a rejiggering of software and other changes, the MK 41 launchers installed in Poland and Romania can fire not only defensive interceptors but also offensive missiles. Matt Korda, an analyst at the Federation of American Scientists, said that 'without visual inspections, there is no way to determine whether or not this Tomahawk-specific hardware and software have been installed at the Aegis Ashore sites in Europe.' ”
Frankly I'm just really impressed with the level of research and intelligent arguments presented by the both of you without devolving into the usual rhetoric. If only everyone in all countries did more of this, there would be more conversation and probably less war or promotion/acceptance of war in the first place. The Russians have a valid perspective, as do the Ukrainians. It's a nuanced complicated issue that absolutely should have gone and can still go through negotiations if not for other countries (*cough US cough*) getting involved for their benefit.
a brilliant, commanding critique of the current insanity--I want to talk to the author and publish his work--we have to come together against this war--there are more of us than we (probably) realize!
The ad was published by the Eisenhower Network: https://eisenhowermedianetwork.org/
The director of the network, retired Air Force Master Sergeant Dennis Fritz, was interviewed about the ad on Democracy Now: https://www.democracynow.org/2023/5/17/dennis_fritz_ukraine_war_diplomacy_letter
I documented how the US/UK blocked a tentative compromise agreement to end the war between Ukraine and Russia in April 2022: https://twitter.com/paulsurovell/status/1653317537965260808?s=20. We need to turn the (false) war narrative around.
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Right on. Keep doing what you do.
Zelensky, Biden, Satanism, War, Greed, Theft, Propaganda, Domestic Spying, International Intrigue, Treason, Sedition, FTX, Ukraine, Israel . . .
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/zelensky-biden-satanism-war-greed
This is among so many things of which the U.S. government should be ashamed and contrite. Yet these feelings are nowhere to be found in their lexicon.
Jewish Corruption in Ukraine . . . by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.
❝. . . the present conflict is a huge distraction from the fact that, for decades, the biggest threat to Ukraine hasn’t been Russia, but financiers and speculators operating with impunity within Ukraine’s borders to exploit ethnic Ukrainians and plunder their resources.❞
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2023/02/17/jewish-corruption-in-ukraine/
Thank you !!
The most definitive proof that Covid-19 was designed and developed by US bio laboratory:
https://youtu.be/morj-3rdWwM
Jeffrey Sachs: US biotech cartel behind Covid origins and cover-up
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
He has also served as the chair of the COVID-19 (year-long) commission on the virus origin for leading medical journal the Lancet.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
Matt, your article and the ad are on the money.
When looking at the fire and clouds of the bombed ammunition depo, one should also consider the claim by Russian security chief Patrushev included depleted uranium shells admittedly provided by the UK https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/russia-claims-radioactive-cloud-moving-toward-western-europe/2901561. Hopefully the claim is wrong, but that doesn't end the threat of radiation from this delivery from Britain.
Funding Both Sides: How Jewish Money Controls British Politics . . .
“During the previous Labour government, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were ardent Zionists because they accepted the justice of Israel’s cause, not because Labour’s chief fund-raisers were first the Jew Michael Levy and then the Jew Jonathan Mendelsohn (both are now members of the House of Lords). And during the current Conservative government, David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson have been ardent Zionists because they too accept the justice of Israel’s cause, not because the Conservatives’ chief fund-raisers have been first the Jew Sir Mick Davis and then the Jew Sir Ehud Sheleg.”
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/10/04/funding-both-sides-how-jewish-money-controls-british-politics/
Not sure what 'peace movement' you're referring to. Not the one I'm with. True, there are some of the usual peace suspects (especially veterans) who can't get loose of their allegiance to combat as an acceptable tool of national affairs, but in fact the peace movement has been doing all it can to urge cease-fire and negotiations.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-no-7-world-wide-wars
Wow. The amount of fact that is MISSING from that advert (And from your column) is simply amazing. Just as a f'rinstance or two:
1994: [blank]
In reality, Russia signed the Budapest Memorandum, guaranteeing Ukraine's then-borders (cough cough Crimea Donbass Lukhansk cough) in return for Ukraine's turning over two THOUSAND functioning nuclear warheads for dismantlement and disposal. The US did too, you might note. Our shipping them arms and providing other help (all that blather above about the US making this war worse aside) is ENTIRELY in line with our agreement under that Memorandum to respect their sovereignty in their then-current borders, especially in light of Ukraine becoming a "victim of aggression".
2009: US Announces plan to put missile systems into Poland and Romania.
You mean the defensive-only Aegis Ashore installations? That have _standard_ length Mk41 VLS tubes, that are not _strike length_ and thus _incapable of accepting Tomahawk cruise missiles_, but can only accept SM-2/3/-6 SAM/ABM missiles? THOSE missile systems? As opposed to, say, SS-26 Iskander and SS-21 Tochka SRBM systems?
I could continue at length, but I don't think I need to - the point is made.
Never mind the craven, Chamberlain-eseque crie de prostration.
We tried your approach in 1938. It didn't work.
Sorry, but closer scrutiny confirms the timeline of the ad:
Jack Matlock, US amb to USSR from 1987-1991, a signatory of the ad, wrote the following about the Budapest Memorandum in light of the violation of pledge that NATO would not move toward Russia:
With regard to the Budapest Memorandum, former US ambassador to the USSR Jack Matlock (a signer of the ad) has written:
"One persistent U.S. demand is that Ukraine’s territorial integrity be restored. Indeed, the U.S. is party to the Budapest Memorandum in which Russia guaranteed Ukraine’s territorial integrity in return for Ukraine’s transfer of Soviet nuclear weapons to Russia for destruction in accord with U.S.-Soviet arms control agreements. What the U.S. demand ignores is that, under traditional international law, agreements remain valid rebus sic stantibus (things remaining the same). When the Budapest memorandum was signed in 1994 there was no plan to expand NATO to the east and Gorbachev had been assured in 1990 that the alliance would not expand. When in fact it did expand right up to Russia’s borders, Russia was confronted with a radically different strategic situation than existed when the Budapest agreement was signed."
https://jackmatlock.com/2022/11/there-must-be-a-negotiated-settlement-with-russia/
On the MK tubes in Aegis missiles:
"Do the Russians have a point? Technically, yes, but it’s complicated. Few missile defense experts buy Moscow’s argument that the Aegis Ashore system is a covert cover-up for putting cruise missiles closer to Russia’s borders. But the MK 41 launchers inside the missile defense batteries could be adapted to fire Tomahawks, experts said, if all the supporting hardware and software is also upgraded for that purpose. Those updates—or trucking in new weapons—would be difficult to do without tipping Russian intelligence agencies."
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/01/12/putin-russia-us-missile-defense-nato-ukraine/
Sorry, but Moscow's legal remedy to a change in circumstances is to abrogate the agreement legally, and/or renegotiate. There's plenty of examples of that very thing being done. They did neither, so Mr Matlock's biased and fallacious interpretation fails a basic legal test.
As for Aegis Ashore, no, the existing Mk41 launchers could not be adapted to fire Tomahawk. That's why Strike length Mk41 was developed. Because the Tomahawk missiles package is physically incapable of fitting in a standard Mk41 silo.
Jeezus, all this stuff is publicly available, and widely documented.
The ad's timeline accurately states that Russia tried to negotiate a remedy to the changed circumstances in December 2021 but was rebuffed by the US and NATO. And it's also useful to point out that the Euroepan Aegis missiles exist because the US unilaterally broke the ABM treaty, without any effort to do so "legally, and/or renegotiate". Matlock's interpretation of international law is non-biased and accurate.
MK-41s can be adapted to fire Tomahawk missiles. I gave you one publicly available documented source for that in my previous post. Here's another:
"Some independent experts, however, believe that while requiring a rejiggering of software and other changes, the MK 41 launchers installed in Poland and Romania can fire not only defensive interceptors but also offensive missiles. Matt Korda, an analyst at the Federation of American Scientists, said that 'without visual inspections, there is no way to determine whether or not this Tomahawk-specific hardware and software have been installed at the Aegis Ashore sites in Europe.' ”
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/16/world/europe/poland-missile-base-russia-ukraine.html
Frankly I'm just really impressed with the level of research and intelligent arguments presented by the both of you without devolving into the usual rhetoric. If only everyone in all countries did more of this, there would be more conversation and probably less war or promotion/acceptance of war in the first place. The Russians have a valid perspective, as do the Ukrainians. It's a nuanced complicated issue that absolutely should have gone and can still go through negotiations if not for other countries (*cough US cough*) getting involved for their benefit.
Volodymyr Zelensky is an Israeli operative, the Ukrainian parliament is full of Jewish apparatchiks.
Ukraine’s Azov Regiment Visits Israel: ‘Mariupol is our Masada’ . . .
https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/12/ukraines-azov-regiment-visits-israel-mariupol-is-our-masada/