Hi again, I'm just looking at the paper. Adverse events were dismissed, though they were about 22% in both groups. I can't find what the placebo was- it says it was a 'matched placebo' or a 'placebo for ritonavir q12h'?? The AZ trial used the meningitis jab as placebo - a common way to hide adverse events.
Also the paper only seems to refer to 'covid' deaths. It mentions that the viral load also dropped in treatment arm. If ritonavir is as powerful and oxidising agent as say AZT then the genetic sequences that indicte a positive for 'covid' or 'covid death' may well be mutated, altered and reduced and the patient less likely to test PCR positive. This has nothing to do with indicating that there are less deaths overall or that the drug is doing the patient any good at all.
Hiya, i am very suspicious of trials carried out by those with enormous vested interests. I didn't realise how vested they were.
The trial you mentioned with 12 deaths in the placebo and none in treatment (the hospitalisations were dismissed by the Spanish paper you quoted) giving a risk reduction of 1.15% reminded me of the Pfizer paper, which you may know was plagued with problems, not least the hiding of 15 deaths in the appendix making the jabs higher in all cause mortality than the placebo.
You also talk about 'covid' as though it's a distinct disease with one cause and not a combination of detox symptoms like all 'infectious' disease. You also talk about variants as though they had been established as entities and not just imagined genomes assembled from fragments in unpurified samples.
Great column. Wish you could get it printed in NYT or other msm.
Hi again, I'm just looking at the paper. Adverse events were dismissed, though they were about 22% in both groups. I can't find what the placebo was- it says it was a 'matched placebo' or a 'placebo for ritonavir q12h'?? The AZ trial used the meningitis jab as placebo - a common way to hide adverse events.
Also the paper only seems to refer to 'covid' deaths. It mentions that the viral load also dropped in treatment arm. If ritonavir is as powerful and oxidising agent as say AZT then the genetic sequences that indicte a positive for 'covid' or 'covid death' may well be mutated, altered and reduced and the patient less likely to test PCR positive. This has nothing to do with indicating that there are less deaths overall or that the drug is doing the patient any good at all.
Hiya, i am very suspicious of trials carried out by those with enormous vested interests. I didn't realise how vested they were.
The trial you mentioned with 12 deaths in the placebo and none in treatment (the hospitalisations were dismissed by the Spanish paper you quoted) giving a risk reduction of 1.15% reminded me of the Pfizer paper, which you may know was plagued with problems, not least the hiding of 15 deaths in the appendix making the jabs higher in all cause mortality than the placebo.
You also talk about 'covid' as though it's a distinct disease with one cause and not a combination of detox symptoms like all 'infectious' disease. You also talk about variants as though they had been established as entities and not just imagined genomes assembled from fragments in unpurified samples.
https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
You are wise to not treat your patients with these toxic substances making fat cats fatter, and instead support them with nutrition, rest and love.
🐒
Share with your doc at risk of being asked to find another provider